Mizz_SolyX_daGoddess - add/view comments ()

Blunt News

From Wall Street Journal 5/21/2010
A3

Rand Paul

First Rand Paul stated he would not had voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, then he changed his mind. The GOP is rightfully worried, because already the Republicn Party is wrongly seen by minorities as a White Party. The Republicans have to show that they are a political party that believes in capitalism, the growth of private industry, not racism. However, with Rand Paul continuing to waver on Civil Rights and the historic "legal" elimination of it, and the Republican Party's inability to question his motives, it further defends my idea that the Republican Party has lost it's power to the Neo-Conservative movement, which is latent with racism.


From Wall Street Journal 5/21/2010
A3

Defending Dennis Blair

A retired US Navy Admiral, Dennis Blair, was Director of National Inttelligence, or (DNI), and is leaving his post after one year of tenure. DNI was created after 911 to theoretically bring all US agencies together so they can share information to keep from 911 from happening again. However, the political volatility should not be misunderstood within each agency and outside of them. The failure to bring this volatile political gamemanship has led to 5 other dismisaals from this position of power.

(1) What is not questioned is how the Christmas Bomber went from Africa, to Europe, unnoticed, before reaching the US? If the Christmas bomber would have acted before his landing in the US, would the political fallout for Admiral Blair been different? Why are we not asking the British why they allowed a questiionable passenger into Britain before even entering a plane to get to the US?
(2) The last attack in NYC, was to me, sloppy and a desperate act from the Pakistan Al Queda. Why? Since the beginning of the year, the Obama Administration has apprehended some notable mid level operatives with Pakistans help. However, as I stated to my reader's before, these where the moderates of this terrorist group, leaving only us with the extremists in power. I call it sloppy because:
(a) the suspect came into the US from a known hot spot in Pakistan,
(b) was on the US Treasury watch list
(c) was on FACEBOOK
(d) was apprehended rapidly

Talk radio is only neo-conservative, and will never congradulate the Obama administration for the apprehension of the mid level AL Queda members in Pakistan. But that leaves the question, where they caught to leave the extremists in power?

From Wall Street Journal 5/21/2010
A5

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
This is for you California and Detroit, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are coming up with a complaint procedure for people who believe home appraisals where improperly done through them. Believe what Alan Greenspan stated before, that hosuing prices are improperly inflated? Now is your chance,if you are underwater, or owe more than what your home is worth, this may help you. I'll keep you posted.

From Wall Street Journal 5/21/2010
A11

The Chinese Chess Game

China Investment Corp, or (CIC), has a 300 billion sovereign wealth fund, but wouldn't help the Greek government by buying Greek Bonds, and Greece, Europe, and the US don't like that. Would you lend to someone who couldn't pay their bills? Not only that - the Greek government lied to get into the Euro-zone, by hiding it's debt with the help of Goldman Sacs.
Question:

(1) Is China waiting for a bigger fish to fry? Britain or the US?
(2) By Germany not allowing Turkey to enter the European Union, is this why Turkey has leaned toward Iran?

Kagan, and the politics of Gay Rights


I stated before, President Obama tapped Kagan for Supreme COurt Nominee to please the gay and liberal vote. We live in a politically correct world, and a mid term election year, so the Republicans have there hands behind there backs. Good move President Obama. However, because of this politically correct world, and a female, the question of her sexualality is political nitro glycerine, so I'll say it.
One: By letting a lebian into the Supreme Court, which is a lifelong seat, what does this means for Gay Rights?
Two: Kagan recently argued about keeping sexually dangerous prisoners in custody beyond their sentences (WSJ A2), is that unconstitutioonal? Where will this end? Who else can be held, indefinitely? What crimes? I'm not talking about terrorists here, I'm talking US citizens.
Three: OK, let's talk about the pedophile priests out there, can they be held indefintely also? And why are we not hunting them down?
Four: So you want to talk about Gay Rights, about Gays in the military, but never talk about AIDS, which is higher in homosexuals. So, are we actually arguing for the spread of AIDS? And, whose going to pay for the taking care of them medically? You bet, the tax payer.

Stay Strong Sister!!!!!
NubianGraphics.com