Forums


Did you know that lightskinned-Blacks in LA, owned negro Slaves (30)

Reply
Comments Options
Sort comments by:




Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ

Posted July 14, 2012


TokenBlackGuy85
TokenBlackGuy85

Male, 27, Warrenton, OR


Or the facts that slavery existed before the 1600s and definitely not some phenomenon that the Europeans invented. African tribes had their own slaves most of them were prisoners of war or they owed some debt, some were treated fairly and some were tortured.


Different dichotomy different dimension different circumstance, as...

-Africans enslaving each other, in African jungles, is not ever egregious as What happened in America
-what happened here feat. Mulattos using their half-White side, to push a racist White agenda which featured enslaving 100%-Africans who were Darkskinned so put in bondage as 'Beasts Of Burden' to increase the GDP of White racist men.


Of course, I understand it is in your muscle-memory to defend gv and any lightskinned-racism he promotes, but...

even you have to stand back, here, and take a long hard look at the treachery in apologizing for lightskinned-racism before you do it.


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Female, 29, Indianapolis, IN

Posted July 14, 2012


They weren't light skinned blacks they were mixed race.

Most likey they were free Carribean Mullatto's, Quaroons, Octroons, or Native Americans who mixed with whites.

Mixed race people that weren't enslaved didn't think of themselves as black so it wasn't hard for them to own black people.

They wanted to be considered a sub-racial group of either French or Spanish term "Creole or Mullatto".

And African's didn't sell other African's into slavery, that is a lie. (Think about it)

If that were the case wouldn't African's be as rich as some white American's are today from having a hand in the slave trade?

The truth is rival tribes that had already had European influence (meaning they were mixing with white Europeans) helped capture other tribes for the white Europeans to enslave.

Europeans did the same thing to the Native Americans before they conquered them they mixed with them and used their mixed race offspring to start war's with the original Natives.


Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ

Posted July 14, 2012


Good drop, nana. Especially that scholarship on how slaves were not sold to White men during when they were captured, in the African-jungle.


And Did you read the link? Where it mentions the slave-owning mulattos who were born from White slave-master's raping & impregnating Black women?


Plus...since there were no lightskinned-slaves in the belly of no Slave ships that docked in the Western world, then...How were American mulattos, not Black people? Since they all came from Black women?


JUSTIN_00
JUSTIN_00

Male, 39, Columbus, OH

Posted July 14, 2012


Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ


Nope. That's not what I am saying.

I am saying that millions of lightskinned-Blacks, have ancestors who owned Black Slaves. As you and I both know that the only myth here, is now a reality verified as true; lightskinned Blacks can't be, pro-Black.

Which explains why you have gv or JUSTIN enraged and in sabotaging-troll mode, whenever an anti-racism thread gets created. Plus this helps explain why Obama has no tolerance for Black-darkies being treated equal as other White-looking minorities in America.


LMAO! You truly are an idiot of epic proportions. lol

I'm gonna cut right to the chase monkey. You ain't as "dark skinned" as you like to pretend you are.

You ain't as "pro-black" as you like to pretend you are.

Now you are as fukking stupid as a split log just as you portray your yourself to be. So that's a point for you.

You anti black testicle juggler. lol


SenorCafeDa2nd
SenorCafeDa2nd

Male, Age Private, Paterson, NJ

Posted July 14, 2012


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Female, 29, Indianapolis, IN


They weren't light skinned blacks they were mixed race.

Most likey they were free Carribean Mullatto's, Quaroons, Octroons, or Native Americans who mixed with whites.

Mixed race people that weren't enslaved didn't think of themselves as black so it wasn't hard for them to own black people.

They wanted to be considered a sub-racial group of either French or Spanish term "Creole or Mullatto".

And African's didn't sell other African's into slavery, that is a lie. (Think about it)

If that were the case wouldn't African's be as rich as some white American's are today from having a hand in the slave trade?

The truth is rival tribes that had already had European influence (meaning they were mixing with white Europeans) helped capture other tribes for the white Europeans to enslave.

Europeans did the same thing to the Native Americans before they conquered them they mixed with them and used their mixed race offspring to start


Read your damm history,

There were plenty of plane ole black free mofo who owned black slaves they weren't all mixed nothing. Plenty of niggas emulated their white oppressors and brought and sold black people.

Black folks arent no different than any other opportunistic mofo throughout history, they enslaved, brought, and sold their own fuggin people. You sound like a damm idiot sometime.


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Female, 29, Indianapolis, IN

Posted July 14, 2012


Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ


Good drop, nana. Especially that scholarship on how slaves were not sold to White men during when they were captured, in the African-jungle.


And Did you read the link? Where it mentions the slave-owning mulattos who were born from White slave-master's raping & impregnating Black women?


Plus...since there were no lightskinned-slaves in the belly of no Slave ships that docked in the Western world, then...How were American mulattos, not Black people? Since they all came from Black women?


I didn't click on the link but...

There is a difference between being a light skin black person and being a mixed race person.

A mixed race person is used to cause division amongst the original race of people.

Divide and conquer.

Creating division is the only way they can conquer any group of people.

The original race and mixed race will be too busy fighting each other that they won't notice the foreign race of people are taking over.

So regular light skin black folk's didn't own slaves.

Elite mixed raced sub-groups who inheirted wealth owned slaves.

These group's are so white you wouldn't consider them to black or light skin anything.

White's bred black folk's like horses.

Some were bred to do hard manuel labor (NFL)

Some to work in the house (Clerance Thomas)

And a small group were bred to look as close to white as possible (Soledad O'Brian) to stand in the place of authority over the others in the absence of the white slave owners.


Removed

The content you are trying to view has been removed.


Removed

The content you are trying to view has been removed.


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Female, 29, Indianapolis, IN

Posted July 14, 2012


SenorCafeDa2nd
SenorCafeDa2nd

Male, Age Private, Paterson, NJ


Read your damm history,

There were plenty of plane ole black free mofo who owned black slaves they weren't all mixed nothing. Plenty of niggas emulated their white oppressors and brought and sold black people.

Black folks arent no different than any other opportunistic mofo throughout history, they enslaved, brought, and sold their own fuggin people. You sound like a damm idiot sometime.


It's funny how white Americans have convinced us that Africans enslaved, bought, and sold our own people as if whites have no hand in slavery.

If African's were the masterminds behind slavery where's the wealth?

What did Africans have to gain by enslaving their own people?

The major group's who owned slaves where the French mixtures (Creole's) of Haiti and South.

They may have moved and spread out over the Southern states but the same few families had the wealth and ownership.

They were even so sick that the intermarried and inbred with each other to keep the money in the family.

These familes exist to this very day but most are so white you wouldn't consider them to be black nor would they claim any African heritage.

This is why some Black folk's like to claim Creole or French heritage because they owned slaves.

No regular black folk's had any money to buy slaves, most were slaves their damn selves so how could they save up money to buy slaves?


ghetto_blaster
ghetto_blaster

Male, Age Private, Beverly Hills, CA

Posted July 14, 2012


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Female, 29, Indianapolis, IN


It's funny how white Americans have convinced us that Africans enslaved, bought, and sold our own people as if whites have no hand in slavery.

If African's were the masterminds behind slavery where's the wealth?

What did Africans have to gain by enslaving their own people?

The major group's who owned slaves where the French mixtures (Creole's) of Haiti and South.

They may have moved and spread out over the Southern states but the same few families had the wealth and ownership.

They were even so sick that the intermarried and inbred with each other to keep the money in the family.

These familes exist to this very day but most are so white you wouldn't consider them to be black nor would they claim any African heritage.

This is why some Black folk's like to claim Creole or French heritage because they owned slaves.

No regular black folk's had any money to buy slaves, most were slaves their damn selves so how c


I guess that makes you mixed race and non-black.

West Africans don't look like you


Showing 11-20 of 30