Forums


Did you know that lightskinned-Blacks in LA, owned negro Slaves (30)

Reply
Comments Options
Sort comments by:




Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ

Posted July 13, 2012


Yes, it's true. There were lightskinned-Blacks All throughout the 1600's - 1800's indeed. Its been verified that Large numbers of free lightskinned-Blacks hated themselves, so much, and loved their White Heritage so much to whereas they owned black slaves in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society. 

According to the federal census of 1830, free blacks owned more than 10,000 slaves in Louisiana, Maryland, South Carolina, and Virginia.  The majority of black slave-owners lived in Louisiana and planted sugar cane.



At least now, you all can cease wondering why gv JUSTIN and other lightskinned-racists hate me, so much.


Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ

Posted July 13, 2012


"...The Black Slave Owners

THE BLACK SLAVE OWNERS

By Joseph E. Holloway

The majority of black slave owners were members of the mulatto class, and in some cases were the sons and daughters of white slave masters.  Many of the mulatto slave owners separated themselves from the masses of black people and attempted to establish a caste system based on color, wealth, and free status. According to Martin Delany, the colored community of Charleston City clung to the assumptions of the superiority of white blood and brown skin complexion.

These mulattoes of the old free Black elite did not attend church with the dark-skinned blacks of Charleston City.  They not only formed congregations which excluded freedmen of dark complexion, but they only married among other mulattoes to ⿿keep the color in the family.⿝

Large numbers of free Blacks owned black slaves in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society.  According to the federal census of 1830, free blacks owned more than 10,000 slaves in Louisiana, Maryland, South Carolina, and Virginia.  The majority of black slave-owners lived in Louisiana and planted sugar cane.

Slave holding among the mulatto class in South Carolina was widespread according to the first census of 1790, which revealed that 36 out of 102, or 35.2 percent of the free Black heads of family held slaves in Charleston City.  By 1800 one out of every three free black recorded owning slave property.  Between 1820 and 1840 the percentage of slaveholding heads of family ranged from 72.1 to 77.7 percent, however, by 1850 the percentage felt to 42.3 percent...."

http://slaverebellion.org/inde x.php?page=the-black-slave-own ers


ACCOUNT CLOSED
CLOSED

Male, Age Private, Antarctica

Posted July 13, 2012


Great, you posted the link.

I'll check this out later.


Removed

The content you are trying to view has been removed.


gvsl1m
gvsl1m

Male, 43, Phoenix, AZ

Posted July 13, 2012


Your point is?


Removed

The content you are trying to view has been removed.


SenorCafeDa2nd
SenorCafeDa2nd

Male, Age Private, Paterson, NJ

Posted July 13, 2012


So are you saying that blacks were just as opportunistic as whites when it came to owning slaves. If they could get away with it the did it.

Thanks for sharing this, kinda dispels a lot of pro black myths


gvsl1m
gvsl1m

Male, 43, Phoenix, AZ

Posted July 13, 2012


SenorCafeDa2nd
SenorCafeDa2nd

Male, Age Private, Paterson, NJ


So are you saying that blacks were just as opportunistic as whites when it came to owning slaves. If they could get away with it the did it.

Thanks for sharing this, kinda dispels a lot of pro black myths


Let's not forget our African brothers on the other side of the Atlantic selling negors to the Europeans


TokenBlackGuy85
TokenBlackGuy85

Male, 27, Warrenton, OR

Posted July 13, 2012


gvsl1m
gvsl1m

Male, 43, Phoenix, AZ


Let's not forget our African brothers on the other side of the Atlantic selling negors to the Europeans


Or the facts that slavery existed before the 1600s and definitely not some phenomenon that the Europeans invented. African tribes had their own slaves most of them were prisoners of war or they owed some debt, some were treated fairly and some were tortured.


Still_Rehearsals
Still_Rehearsals

Male, Age Private, Scottsdale, AZ

Posted July 14, 2012


SenorCafeDa2nd
SenorCafeDa2nd

Male, Age Private, Paterson, NJ


So are you saying that blacks were just as opportunistic as whites when it came to owning slaves. If they could get away with it the did it.

Thanks for sharing this, kinda dispels a lot of pro black myths


Nope. That's not what I am saying.

I am saying that millions of lightskinned-Blacks, have ancestors who owned Black Slaves. As you and I both know that the only myth here, is now a reality verified as true; lightskinned Blacks can't be, pro-Black.

Which explains why you have gv or JUSTIN enraged and in sabotaging-troll mode, whenever an anti-racism thread gets created. Plus this helps explain why Obama has no tolerance for Black-darkies being treated equal as other White-looking minorities in America.


Showing 1-10 of 30

1 2 3
Next >>