tedjs - add/view comments ()

obama has made the statement that iran pursuit of nuclear weapons are "unacceptable."Iran has always stated that their nuclear program was for peaceful purposes.By making the statement does that mean that obama as president adopt the bush policy of preempted military strike on other countries that they considers a threat? This same policy could push america into a nuclear confrontation with China and Russia. that should remind americans that obama runs nothings and is not resisting the strings of his puppet masters. Obama is apparently doing what The new world order(one world government) tells him.

zx

PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN OF BRITAIN AGAIN CALLS FOR

ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT:

THE USUAL SUSPECTS

THE BAILOUT BILL WAS AN ECONOMIC 911. THE BILL ILLEGALLY WENT THROUGH THE SENATE THEN BACK TO THE HOUSE. MARTIAL LAW WAS ALSO THREATEN TO GET THE BILL PASSED

ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGAIN USE FEAR TO CAUSE CONGRESS TO PASS LAWS THAT ARE UNCONSTITUTION. THE BAILOUT BILL, THE RESCUE BILL, IS AN ACT OF HIGH TREASON.GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH,CONGRESS, AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR HIGH TREASON. THEY SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR ATTEMPTING TO OVERTHROW THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.BUSH HAS ALREADY DECLARED HIMSELF DICTATOR WITH PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 51. ALSO, WITH THE PROMPTING OF THE PRESIDENT CONGRESS PASSED THE FISA BILL TO MAKE IT LEGAL TO SPY ON AMERICANS. NO MATTER WHAT LAWS THESE CRIMINALS PASS IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS TIME FOR AMERICANS TO WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT THIS IS AN ATTACK ON OUR LIBERTIES AND OUR ECONOMIC SURVIVAL

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate Vote Summary Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R. 6304 ) Vote Number: 168 Vote Date: July 9, 2008, 02:47 PM Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Bill Passed Measure Number: H.R. 6304 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ) Measure Title: A bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance By Home State Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---69 Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Barrasso (R-WY) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burr (R-NC) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Feinstein (D-CA) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Inouye (D-HI) Isakson (R-GA) Johnson (D-SD) Kohl (D-WI) Kyl (R-AZ) Landrieu (D-LA) Lieberman (ID-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Lugar (R-IN) Martinez (R-FL) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Obama (D-IL) Pryor (D-AR) Roberts (R-KS) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stevens (R-AK) Sununu (R-NH) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA) Webb (D-VA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wicker (R-MS) NAYs ---28 Akaka (D-HI) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Clinton (D-NY) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Harkin (D-IA) Kerry (D-MA) Klobuchar (D-MN) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Menendez (D-NJ) Murray (D-WA) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Sanders (I-VT) Schumer (D-NY) Stabenow (D-MI) Tester (D-MT) Wyden (D-OR) Not Voting - 3 Kennedy (D-MA) McCain (R-AZ) Sessions (R-AL) Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State Grouped by Home State Alabama: Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting Shelby (R-AL), Yea Alaska: Murkowski (R-AK), Yea Stevens (R-AK), Yea Arizona: Kyl (R-AZ), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Not Voting Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Pryor (D-AR), Yea California: Boxer (D-CA), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Yea Colorado: Allard (R-CO), Yea Salazar (D-CO), Yea Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Nay Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Nay Carper (D-DE), Yea Florida: Martinez (R-FL), Yea Nelson (D-FL), Yea Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Yea Isakson (R-GA), Yea Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Nay Inouye (D-HI), Yea Idaho: Craig (R-ID), Yea Crapo (R-ID), Yea Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Nay Obama (D-IL), Yea Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea Lugar (R-IN), Yea Iowa: Grassley (R-IA), Yea Harkin (D-IA), Nay Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Yea Roberts (R-KS), Yea Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Yea Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Vitter (R-LA), Yea Maine: Collins (R-ME), Yea Snowe (R-ME), Yea Maryland: Cardin (D-MD), Nay Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting Kerry (D-MA), Nay Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Nay Stabenow (D-MI), Nay Minnesota: Coleman (R-MN), Yea Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay Mississippi: Cochran (R-MS), Yea Wicker (R-MS), Yea Missouri: Bond (R-MO), Yea McCaskill (D-MO), Yea Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea Tester (D-MT), Nay Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Yea Nelson (D-NE), Yea Nevada: Ensign (R-NV), Yea Reid (D-NV), Nay New Hampshire: Gregg (R-NH), Yea Sununu (R-NH), Yea New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay Menendez (D-NJ), Nay New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Nay Domenici (R-NM), Yea New York: Clinton (D-NY), Nay Schumer (D-NY), Nay North Carolina: Burr (R-NC), Yea Dole (R-NC), Yea North Dakota: Conrad (D-ND), Yea Dorgan (D-ND), Nay Ohio: Brown (D-OH), Nay Voinovich (R-OH), Yea Oklahoma: Coburn (R-OK), Yea Inhofe (R-OK), Yea Oregon: Smith (R-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Nay Pennsylvania: Casey (D-PA), Yea Specter (R-PA), Yea Rhode Island: Reed (D-RI), Nay Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea South Carolina: DeMint (R-SC), Yea Graham (R-SC), Yea South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea Thune (R-SD), Yea Tennessee: Alexander (R-TN), Yea Corker (R-TN), Yea Texas: Cornyn (R-TX), Yea Hutchison (R-TX), Yea Utah: Bennett (R-UT), Yea Hatch (R-UT), Yea Vermont: Leahy (D-VT), Nay Sanders (I-VT), Nay Virginia: Warner (R-VA), Yea Webb (D-VA), Yea Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Nay Murray (D-WA), Nay West Virginia: Byrd (D-WV), Nay Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Nay Kohl (D-WI), Yea Wyoming: Barrasso (R-WY), Yea Enzi (R-WY), Yea Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State

Corporate Media Loathe To Explain Real Outrage Behind Terror Comments Press fails to point out track record of Neo-Cons contracting for attacks Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | The media circus surrounding McCain advisor Charlie Black's statement that another terror attack would be a "big advantage" in the election contest has completely failed to explain why such comments are so disturbing. After all, Black's statement is essentially true - if there was to be another 9/11-style event in America before November it would virtually guarantee a McCain presidency. This is not what is so outrageous about Black's comments. The real story that the corporate media is loathe to divulge is that Black and many other Neo-Cons, including former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, are in effect not just yearning for, but openly calling for more terror - a point which is especially prescient when one accepts that 9/11 was a self-inflicted wound. (Article continues below) Neo-Cons are not just hoping that terror will arrive gift-wrapped at the most politically expedient time, in their desperation they are are actively signaling for those that carried out 9/11 to launch another attack. The response to Black's comments has been tenfold when compared with the non-existent mainstream media coverage of excerpts of confidential recordings released under the Freedom of Information Act which feature Donald Rumsfeld talking with top military analysts about needing the "correction" of a terror attack to get sympathy for the Neo-Con agenda on Capitol Hill. The silence was also deafening on the back of a 2005 Republican memo which touted a new terror attack as a means of helping George W. Bush to reclaim popular approval and "restore his image as a leader of the American people." By failing to provide the track record of identical rhetoric emanating from within the administration itself, the media is making out that Black's comments are a one-off spectacle. In reality, as we have exhaustively documented, there are numerous examples to document the trend. The latest example was former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who during a Long Island bookstore appearance stated, "The more successful they've been at intercepting and stopping bad guys, the less proof there is that we're in danger. And therefore, the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.' And it's almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us."

Framing The Truth Movement As Terrorists Bellicose establishment hacks like O'Reilly and Beck pray for another attack so they can blame it on peaceful activists who are putting them to shame Steve Watson & Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Thursday, November 1, 2007 A disturbing trend has emerged amongst establishment "news" hacks who are raising the same talking point ad infinitum, dubbing the global truth movement as "anarchists" and violent individuals who may be aiding terrorists, and praying for another attack in America so they can blame peaceful activists who are consistently putting the Neo-Cons to shame. Over the past weeks and months talking heads such as Fox News bigot Bill O'Reilly and his frothing caricature Glenn Beck over on CNN, have specifically targeted 9/11 truthers in segments designed to portray the movement as dangerous and sow the seed in the minds of what viewers they have left that peaceful truth seekers are actually in league with violent terrorists. Two weeks ago Beck aired a response to the We Are Change infiltration of Bill Maher's show in which he stated: "These truthers are exactly the kind of people who want to rock this nation's foundation, tear us apart and plant the seeds of dissatisfaction in all of us." (Article continues below) At one point Beck even suggested that the 9/11 truth movement is "the kind of group a Timothy McVeigh would come from", insinuating the movement is intent on violence and terrorism. In thousands of 9/11 protests over the course of the last six years, not one person has been arrested for violent conduct. To carte blanche suggest that the truth movement is dangerous, "a threat to children" and intent on violence is extremely inflammatory and indicates just how afraid of everyday people investigating and debating the facts people like Glenn Beck actually are. The core of the 9/11 truth movement is composed of well educated and rational thinking individuals who are strictly opposed to violence and are intent on protecting a free and peaceful society which has been under dire threat ever since the attacks of 9/11 and the ensuing cover up. Furthermore, the movement represents the very antithesis of anarchism in that it is actively seeking to restore and protect our traditional form of government which has been usurped by an unaccountable cabal that continues to operate outside of Constitutional law and with little restraint, using 9/11 as justification. Most recently Bill O'Reilly has been running segments, such as the one below, suggesting that questions over 9/11, the war on terror and the war in Iraq are "going to lead to violence": O'Reilly flat out states "This is going to lead to death" and makes all kind of threats stating, "If they are not reigned in by the authorities, and they should be...somebody is going to get hurt." We could announce that Bill O'Reilly is dangerous and aids terrorists, based on O'Reilly's own standard for claiming that people are dangerous and aid terrorists - i.e. no evidence whatsoever except the fact that he disagrees with their politics. If anyone is a threat to the American way of life then it's Beck and O'Reilly - having implicated themselves with a history of repugnant statements proving they are enemies of the Constitution and the freedoms that define America. In addition, the only violent statements made on 9/11 truth websites have been written by trolls and debunkers attempting to discredit the movement - they should be investigated for advocating violence, not peaceful activists who are merely trying to speak truth to power. People like O'Reilly and Glenn Beck would relish the opportunity to have their baseless allegations "proved right", and should some act of violence or terrorism be carried out, whether real or staged, they would love to blame it on the 9/11 truth movement, in a similar way to how the patriot movement was blamed for the OKC bombing in 1995. With the explosion of the alternative media and with more and more people confronting government officials and elitist figures from the US to Canada to the UK, in "guerilla journalism" style, the mainstream media has come to realize that they can no longer get away with reporting only one side of the story. Figures like Beck and O'Reilly are running scared because they know the people are no longer buying into their manipulative propaganda and are searching for the truth themselves. Such shameful tactics are not going to work because the horse has already bolted and the seeds of truth have been scattered over the globe by the winds of change. What we are witnessing is the establishment's desperate attempt to cling onto their information monopoly as the Internet, alternative radio and guerilla activism grow in leaps and bounds while the mainstream withers away and loses all credibility. As Gandhi said - First they ignore us, then they laugh at us, and then they attack us. Then we win.